Dec 18, 2025 City Council

WELL, THEY DID THE SAME THING AT THAT BATCH PLANT THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, MA'AM.

AND IT ENDED UP BLOWING ACROSS MY CUSTOMER'S TRUCKS AND WHATNOT, BUT THEY CAME OVER AND WASHED THOSE TRUCKS OFF AND, AND DEALT WITH IT.

I DIDN'T GO SCREAMING AT THE WORLD OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

IT, IT, WE, IT JUST STUFF HAPPENED.

I HAD IT IN MY HOUSE.

OH, IT WAS BLOWING THE WHOLE WAY ACROSS THE HIGHWAY, EVERYTHING.

BUT, YOU KNOW, IT, IT WAS WHAT IT WAS.

AND THAT LASTED THREE, FOUR MONTHS OR SO.

AND, AND THEN IT, THEN IT DISAPPEARED.

BUT I'M, I'M WILLING TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE, MA'AM.

DID YOU EVER, UH, YOU HAD, YOU ASKED FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS TO FINISH THE PARKING LOT.

DID THAT GET DONE? IT, IT WAS TO MIX THAT CONCRETE INTO THE ROCK? IF YOU READ THE, THE, UH, THAT WAS BEFORE YOU GOT YOUR CO YES, MA'AM.

RIGHT, SIR? YES, MA'AM.

IS IS IT LOOSE TO THE TOUCH NOW? LIKE CAN YOU JUST REACH AND PICK IT UP? MA'AM? I'M DRIVING 90 OR 120,000 POUND TRUCKS ON THAT, ON THAT PARKING LOT.

IT DOES NOT, IF, IF IT WAS LOOSE, IT WOULD BURY IN THAT I YOUR FIRE TRUCKS.

HERE'S PICTURES OF IT.

BUT WHAT I'M SAYING IS THERE IS A CO OKAY.

THOSE, THERE'S, IF I MAY, HOW, HOW DID, HOW DID YOU COME TO 'EM TO GET THEM PICTURES? RIGHT? DID YOU GO ON THESE PEOPLE'S PROPERTY? I, LET'S SEE WHO SAYS THAT? I, I BELIEVE THAT PICTURE IS BACK WHERE I, I HAD A, UH, ROCK.

I DIDN'T BASICALLY LIKE A SIDEWALK, A LANDING ZONE FOR 18 WHEELERS TO WHAT IS TO GO ON PEOPLE'S PROPERTY AND TAKE PICTURES.

I'VE NEVER BEEN ON THAT PROPERTY.

THEN YOU CANNOT USE THOSE PICTURES.

I BELIEVE THESE WERE, THIS WAS, I'M SORRY, MA'AM.

I THINK MY ONLY QUESTION, AND MY ONLY QUESTION IS THIS WHOLE PILE CAME FROM KRISTEN.

THIS HAPPENED BEFORE I WAS ON THE COUNCIL.

WAS THERE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE SPACE THAT BECAME BAY? I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE HECK SHE'S TALKING ABOUT.

I HAVE THE PAPERWORK RIGHT HERE.

WHICH I TOOK A A 20 FOOT STORAGE SHED AND ADDED ANOTHER 20 FEET TO IT AND ADDED FOUR BAYS TO THAT BACK.

THAT'S, THAT'S MY ONLY QUESTION.

SO I KNOW WE, SINCE THE ORIGINAL TIME THAT I COME TO CITY COUNCIL, EIGHT YEARS AGO, WE DID ADD 20 FEET ONTO THE BACK OF THE BACK OF THE BUILDING,

[00:05:01]

AND THAT'S WHAT I ASKED FOR.

I EXTENDED THE FIRE LANE IN ORDER TO DO THAT.

IT WASN'T LIKE I JUST DID AWAY WITH THE FIRE LANE WHEN I DID THAT, WHICH CREATED A VERY EXPENSIVE THING TO DO.

BUT I KNEW THAT'S WHAT HAD TO HAPPEN FOR IT TO BE GOOD ENOUGH, ENOUGH FOR Y'ALL.

AND I WENT THROUGH YOUR, YOUR CITY TO, IN ORDER TO DO THAT AND DID IT.

AND YOU GOT APPROVAL.

WHEN IT YES, MA'AM.

WHEN IT WAS COMPLETED? YES.

LIKE I SAID, HE'S GOT A CO THAT CO CANNOT BE BROKEN.

AND MR. HOL, AM I RIGHT ON THAT? YES.

A CO IT DOESN'T LAST FOREVER AND SOMEBODY CAN BE IN VIOLATION.

MAYOR, MAYOR, IF YOU WANNA POINT TO ANY LAW, IF YOU WANT TO POINT TO ANY LAW THAT SHOWS ME, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT SOMEBODY DOES WHEN THEY GET A CO, THEY NEVER LOSE IT.

PLEASE DO SO.

I WILL, I WILL GIVE YOU AS MUCH TIME.

I WILL PAY YOUR HOURLY RATE FOR THAT MAYOR.

I DON'T IF YOU WANT DO THAT, SOMEBODY CAN ABSOLUTELY LOSE THEIR CO SO THE STATEMENT THAT NO MAYOR THAT'S FLAT, WRONG, FLAT, WRONG.

IF SOMEBODY VIOLATES THEIR CO, IT'S REVOKED.

YOU'VE NEVER HEARD OF A CO BEING REVOKED, MAYOR? YES, I HAVE, SIR.

SO THEY CAN'T KEEP IT FOREVER.

YOU JUST SAID THEY CAN'T KEEP IT FOREVER.

I HAVE NO, THEY HAVE NOT IDEA.

I HAVE NO IDEA.

MAYOR, NO CLUE ABOUT THAT.

I DON'T HAVE ANY COMMENT.

I DON'T HAVE ANY OPINION ON THAT.

YOU'RE SIMPLY TELLING ME THAT A CO CAN NEVER BE LOST AND THAT'S NOT TRUE.

THAT WAS WHAT YOU ASKED ME.

THAT IS LIMITED WHAT THEIR CO IS NO IDEA THERE'S IS EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS WHEN IT WAS PRESENTED TO HIM.

I I, I DON'T KNOW.

I'M NOT, I'M NOT ARGUING THAT.

I DON'T HAVE ANY OPINION ON THAT.

'CAUSE I DON'T KNOW.

SO HIS ORIGINAL, DO WE KNOW THAT? THANK YOU, SIR.

NOW, WOULD YOU LIKE TO CONTINUE, MA'AM? UM, I HAVE A LETTER HERE SOMEWHERE FROM RONAS SAYING IT'S BEEN TOO LONG.

SHE CAN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.

IS THAT TRUE? YEAH, THAT'S TRUE.

IS THAT TRUE? I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT.

A PARKING LOT THAT'S NOT FINISHED.

IF, FOR EXAMPLE, THIS IS AN EXAMPLE.

AN EXAMPLE, AN EXAMPLE.

IF SOMEBODY IS REQUIRED BY ZONING, FOR EXAMPLE, IT'S GIVEN AN SUP, AND I HAVE NO IDEA THE SITUATION HERE, BUT IF SOMEBODY IS REQUIRED AN SUP, I DON'T CARE IF THEY HAVE A CO YES.

THE SUP SAYS THEY HAVE TO DO X, Y, OR Z.

SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE.

I DON'T KNOW WHERE IT'S COMING FROM.

BUT IF IT'S SOMETHING LIKE THAT, THEN THE CO HAS NO IMPACT ON THAT WHATSOEVER.

AND YES, THEY'RE, THE SUP SAYS THEY HAVE TO DO THIS, THEN THEY HAVE TO DO THAT.

SO IT WOULD ALL DEPEND ON WHERE THIS IS ORIGINATING AND HOW IT WAS DONE.

BUT DOESN'T THAT NORMALLY GIVE THEM LIKE A, A TIMELINE THAT IT HAS TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN? THAT'S VERY NORMAL.

VERY MINIMAL.

AND SO WE WOULD NEED TO KNOW IF, IF THERE WAS A TIMELINE ESTABLISHED TO IT 24 MONTHS, I WOULD WANT TO KNOW.

BECAUSE THEN IF YOU SAID, I REQUESTED 24 MONTHS.

IT, OR THEY DIDN'T DO IT, WHATEVER.

'CAUSE THEN I WOULD WANT TO KNOW, UH, LIKE COUNCIL MEMBER JACOB SAID, I WOULD'VE WANNA KNOW, LIKE, OKAY, WHY DID, IF IT WAS, LET'S SAY JUST SAY HYPOTHETICALLY IF WAS 24 MONTHS, WHY DIDN'T WE GO AND CHECK IT OUT? AND IF THEY DID IT, WHY WAS IT AN ISSUE? IF THEY DIDN'T DO IT, WHY DIDN'T WE DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT? SO SURE.

I WOULD WANNA KNOW ABOUT THE TIMELINE.

ABSOLUTELY.

WELL, WHY DON'T WE TAKE ALL THIS INFORMATION, UH, GET, YOU KNOW, ALL THE INFORMATION KIM HAS, UH, YOU KNOW, WE'RE GOING THROUGH A SWITCH, YOU KNOW, FROM IN OUR PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

SO WE WILL, UH, GET THAT INFORMATION.

SO IF I, IF I MAY, HOW, HOW CAN WE GO BACK ON SOMETHING THAT A PLANNER DID A, YOU KNOW, UH, IV DID AND, AND CHANGE THAT, SIR.

HOW, HOW ARE WE GONNA, HOW ARE WE GONNA NOT, UH, YOU KNOW, KNOW THAT THEY DIDN'T COMPLY BY THE ORDINANCES THAT WE, WE APPLIED? IF THEY'RE NOT NO LONGER VISIBLE, WE DON'T HAVE 'EM ANYMORE, WELL THEN WE'RE GONNA GET, YOU KNOW, AND, AND IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING, AND I'M NOT GONNA SIT HERE AND SAY IT'S, IT'S THE GOSPEL, BUT THEY WERE GIVING A TEMPORARY CO FOR 24 MONTHS THAT YOU COMPLETE THESE THREE OR FOUR ITEMS, THEN YOU WOULD GET THE PERMANENT CO TWO YEARS COME AND GO.

AND EITHER WE DIDN'T INSPECT IT, THEY DID

[00:10:01]

BUT HERE WE ARE EIGHT YEARS LATER AND THERE'S REALLY NO RESOLUTION ON OUR END.

AND I CAN'T SPEAK FOR WHY WE DIDN'T BLESS IT AT 20 MONTHS OR 24 MONTHS.

AND JUST BECAUSE IT'S BEEN OVER TWO YEARS, CAN WE ENFORCE THAT? AND IT'S ACTUALLY BEEN SEVEN NOW.

SO IT'S, IT'S ACTUALLY BEEN EIGHT YEARS AFTER IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE DONE AND DONE.

AND I'M, AND I'M SURE SOME WOULD, WOULD MAKE THE ARGUMENT.

AND I MEAN, I, I WOULDN'T NECESSARILY DISAGREE THAT IF YOU GAVE HIM TWO YEARS OF DOING AND YOU DIDN'T CHECK ON IT, THEN THAT'S YOUR FAULT.

AND YOU KNOW, IT IS WHAT IT IS.

IT'S APPROVAL AND ABSENCE.

AND WELL, I THINK IT'S BEEN ADDRESSED OVER AND OVER AND OVER FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT THE ADMINISTRATOR JUST KEPT NOT ANSWERING THE PHONE AND WOULDN'T RETURN CALLS.

AND WHEN SHE WROTE THEM, IT'S LIKE, IT'S BEEN TOO LONG.

CAN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.

AND LIKE I SAID, I CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT, BUT, UH, BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, UH, YOU KNOW, WE NEED TO, YOU KNOW, WE CAN TAKE A LOOK AT IT, BUT I HAVE A FEELING I KNOW IT'S GONNA COME OUT.

AND WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT THIS, ALL WEATHER, PARKING SERVICE, UH, SURFACE THE LANGUAGE FROM WHAT I REMEMBER LOOKING AT THIS A MONTH OR SO AGO, WAS, IT WAS PRETTY OPEN-ENDED.

IT WAS LIKE GRAVEL, ROCK, CONCRETE, ASPHALT, OR ANY OTHER THING APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER? NOT IN THIS CASE.

NO.

YOU READ THE WORDS AND YOU'LL SEE.

IT'S, IT'S VERY SPECIFIC.

OKAY, WELL, I'M JUST SAYING WHAT IS WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WENT TO COUNSEL AND THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF THINGS THAT ARE SAID THAT HAPPENED BUT NEVER SHOWED UP TO COUNSEL.

AND I DON'T WORK ON OR WORK OFF OF WHAT OTHER PEOPLE SAY.

IT'S WHAT THIS BODY UP HERE DOES, THE ACTION YOU TAKE, GOOD, BAD, INDIFFERENT, RIGHT OR WRONG, UP OR DOWN.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE RESPOND TO.

AND LIKE I SAID, I CAN'T SPEAK TO, SO DO YOU WANT TABLE THIS AND COME BACK AND TALK TO NO, I'M NOT SAYING TABLE IT.

I'M JUST SAYING WE'RE, I'D KIND OF LIKE TO TABLE IT THEN.

WELL, THAT'S BOTH, THERE'S NO, THIS IS NOT WRITTEN AS AN ACTION ITEM.

IT'S JUST TO DISCUSS.

I DIDN'T KNOW CONSIDER SO, BUT, UM, I, I REALLY AGREE.

IT SHOULD BE TABLED TO LET THESE TWO GENTLEMEN HERE.

READ THIS DOCUMENTS, DO SOME RESEARCH, TALK TO THE PROPERTY BUSINESS OWNER, TRY TO WORK THIS OUT SO THAT IT'S NOT A ISSUE.

AND IF I MAY, UM, MR. TODD THERE SAID HE DIDN'T GET ANY INFORMATION FROM OUR CITY.

SO HOW DO YOU EXPECT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON IF YOU DON'T GIVE 'EM A, A A A, SEND 'EM A LETTER OR SOMETHING? WELL, TODD, IF WE'RE LOOKING IT OVER, THEY CAN ALL GET TOGETHER.

ITEM NUMBER NINE, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER REPEALING ORDINANCES.

THEY CAN ALL GET TOGETHER.

MOVING ON.

UH, WE'RE GONNA, OKAY,

[9. Discuss and consider repealing ordinances O2022-1201B, O2022-1201C, O2022-1201D, O2022-1201E, O2022-1201F, O2022-1201G, O2022-1201H, O2022-1201I, O2022-1201J, O2022-1201K, O2022-1201L, O2022-1201M, O2022-1201N, O2022-1201O, O2022-1201P, O2022-1201Q, O2022-1201R, O2022-1201S, O2022-1201T, O2022-1201U, O2022-1201V, O2022-1201W, O2022-1201X, O2022-1201Y, O2022-1201Z, O2022-1201ZA, O2022-1201ZB, O2022-1201ZC, O2022-1201ZD, O2022-1201ZE, O2022-1201ZF, O2022-1201ZG, O2022-1201ZH, O2023-0119E, O2023-0119F, O2023-0119G, O2023-0119H, O2023-0119I, O2023-0119J, O2023-0119K, O2023-0119L, O2023-0119M, O2023-0119N, O2023-0119O, O2023-0119P, O2023-0119Q, O2023-0119R, O2023-0119S, O2023-0119T, O2023-0119U, O2023-0119V, O2023-0119W, O2023-0119X, O2023-0119Y, O2023-0119Z, O2023-0119ZA, O2023-0119ZB, O2023-0119ZC, O2023-0119ZD, O2023-0119ZE, O2023-0119ZF, O2023-0119ZG, O2023-0119ZH, O2023-0119ZI, O2023-0119ZJ, O2023-0119ZK, O2023-0119ZL, O2023-0119ZM, O2023-0119ZN, O2023-0119ZO, O2023-0119ZP, O2023-0119ZQ, O2023-0119ZR, O2023-0119ZS, O2023-0119ZT, O2023-0119ZU, O2023-0119ZV, O2023-0119ZW, O2023-0119ZX, O2023-0119ZY, O2023-0119ZZ, O2023-0119ZZ-1, O2023-0119ZZ-2, O2023-0119ZZ-3, O2023-0119ZZ-4, O2023-0119ZZ-5, O2023-0119ZZ-6, O2023-0119ZZ-7, O2023-0119ZZ-8, O2023-0119ZZ-9, O2023-0119ZZ-10, O2023-0119ZZ-11, O2023-0119ZZ-12, O2023-0119ZZ-13, O2023-0119ZZ-14, O2023-0119ZZ-15, O2023-0119ZZ-16, O2023-0119ZZ-17, O2023-0119ZZ-18, O2023-0119ZZ-19, O2023-0119ZZ-20, O2023-0119ZZ-21, O2023-0119ZZ-22, O2023-0119ZZ-23, O2023-0119ZZ-24, O2023-0119ZZ-25, O2023-0119ZZ-26, O2023-0119ZZ-27, O2023-0119ZZ-28, O2023-0119ZZ-29, which brought certain tracts of land into the City who had received longstanding treatment from the City pursuant to 41.003 of the Texas Local Government Code.]

OH 2 0 2 2 DASH 21 B THROUGH OH 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 2 1 Z 0 2 0 2 3 DASH 1 1 9 3 THROUGH 0 2 0 2 3 DASH 0 1 1 9 ZZ DASH 29, WHICH BROUGHT CERTAIN TRACKS OF LAND INTO THE CITY WHO HAD RECEIVED LONGSTANDING TREATMENT FOR THE CITY PURSUANT TO FORM 1.003 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.

I HAVE A QUESTION.

ON? BECAUSE, OH, I DON'T, I DON'T REMEMBER THE TIMING.

I WAS PART OF THE COUNCIL WHEN THIS CAME UP.

I ORIGINALLY VOTED NO, I WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO DID.

BUT I REMEMBER IT CAME UP AS ONE ORDINANCE WITH THE LIST OF ADDRESSES.

IT WAS ONE ORDINANCE.

AT WHAT TIME DID IT BECOME SEPARATE ORDINANCES? THANK YOU.

CAN THE LAWYER ADDRESS THAT? YES.

IT WAS ABSOLUTELY ALWAYS SEPARATE ORDINANCES.

AND I KNOW THAT SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE THAT WAS MY ADVICE BECAUSE, AND ACTUALLY IN ALL DUE RESPECT, HE WAS VERY GOOD ADVICE BECAUSE I SAID IF SOMETHING HAPPENS WITH, IF WE DID IT ONE TO ONE ORDINANCE AND SOMETHING HAPPENED WITH THAT ORDINANCE, EVERYTHING WOULD BE WIPED AWAY.

SO THAT'S WHY WE NEEDED TO DO IT.

I SAID, I, IN FACT, I SAID, I KNOW IT'S MORE TIME, I KNOW IT'S MORE MUSCLE MONEY AND I KNOW IT'S MORE HASSLE, BUT IT IS WAY MORE EFFECTIVE TO DO IT THIS WAY.

AND IT TURNS OUT I WAS ACTUALLY RIGHT BECAUSE WE HAD, I DON'T KNOW, ABOUT 15 PROPERTY OWNERS.

THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED.

15.

I UNDERSTAND.

BUT I, I CAN REMEMBER READING THAT WHEN IT WAS VOTED ON, WE READ ADDRESSES.

WE DIDN'T HAVE SEPARATE ORDINANCES THAT NIGHT.

THAT'S RIGHT.

AND SO MY QUESTION IS, DID THEY TURN INTO SEPARATE ORDINANCES AFTER IT WAS VOTED

[00:15:01]

YEAH, I DON'T REMEMBER THE TIMING.

BUT IT WAS, WHEN WE VOTED ON IT THAT NIGHT, THEY WERE READ THIS, THEY WERE SAID, WE'RE VOTING FOR APPROVAL OF THIS WITH THESE ADDRESSES.

UHHUH .

AND SO THEY READ THE ADDRESSES AND WE HAD A VOTE.

AND I WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO SAID NO, EVERYBODY ELSE WAS.

I MEAN, I'M NOT, UM, SAYING THIS, I JUST WANNA HAVE A POINT OF ORDER.

YOU KNOW, ALSO, MY QUESTION IS, HAS THERE BEEN AN INVESTIGATION TO, UM, THE, THESE SPECIFIC PROPERTIES? I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT'S THE INVESTMENT THE CITY HAS MADE INTO THESE PROPERTIES SINCE THEY HAVE BEEN BROUGHT IN? UM, ARE THERE BUSINESSES, ARE THEY RESIDENTIAL AREAS? I WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT THESE PROPERTIES ARE.

SO, UM, THE ADMINISTRATOR HAS WALKED OUT OF THE BUILDING, BUT I WOULD ALSO REQUEST THAT THIS BE TABLED UNTIL SOME FURTHER INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED ON WHAT THESE PROPERTIES ARE.

AND THEN ALSO TO DO SOME RESEARCH FROM, UH, MADAM SECRETARY TO WHEN THESE WERE ACTUALLY VOTED ON.

IF YOU CAN FIND THAT RECORDING AND THAT, UM, SPECIFIC MINUTES OF THAT MEETING.

BECAUSE I AM ALMOST 100% POSITIVE WHEN WE VOTED ON 'EM, IT WAS NOT SEPARATE LIKE THIS.

BECAUSE I WOULD'VE SAID WHAT IN THE WORLD? NOPE.

THEY WERE NOT, THEY WERE ALL TOGETHER AT ONE THING.

BUT YOU REMEMBER THEY WERE SEPARATE.

'CAUSE YOU SAID THEY WERE ALWAYS YEAH, THAT WAS VERY SPECIFICALLY MY ADVICE IS TO NOT DO THEM AS ONE ORDINANCE.

WE DID.

I DON'T KNOW, WE MAY NOT HAVE DONE 'EM AS ONE ORDINANCE, BUT WE HAD ONE VOTE SAYING THAT THESE WERE ALL THE ONES WE WERE BRINGING IN.

NO, THAT MAY BE TRUE.

THAT'S WHAT, AND I REMEMBER YOU READING ADDRESSES.

WE DIDN'T RE WE DID NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THESE ORDINANCE NUMBERS.

THEY WERE NOT READ INTO THE RECORD.

WE READ INTO THE RECORD ADDRESSES.

WE SURE DID.

AND SO MY QUESTION IS, IS AT WHAT TIME, AT WHAT POINT DID THEY GET SEPARATED INTO ACTUALLY BEING DIFFERENT ORDINANCES? BECAUSE AS A BODY, DON'T WE HAVE TO APPROVE ORDINANCES? RIGHT.

WE DON'T APPROVE ADDRESSES.

SO THAT'S WHY I BELIEVE THIS NEEDS TO BE TABLED.

I'M SORRY.

GREAT IDEA.

WE HAVE A PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL MEMBER THAT WAS TABLE IT OR GO AHEAD.

THE ORDINANCE AS IT WAS PRESENTED TO COUNCIL AT AN ATTACHMENT TO A OH, BY EXHIBITS.

HE'S SAYING MAYBE I, SO THERE WERE SEPARATE EX EXHIBIT SEPARATE ATTACHMENTS EXHIBITS.

I, OKAY.

WHY THAT MAY HAVE BEEN WHAT? THAT MAY HAVE BEEN.

WHAT? IT WAS AN ORDINANCE WITH THE EXHIBITS AND EACH EXHIBIT WAS ITS OWN ORDINANCE.

WELL, YOU CAN FIND THAT IN YOUR RECORDS.

CAN'T INVESTIGATION INTO THIS.

SO I, I I WOULD MAKE A REQUEST THAT THIS BEING YOU STEPPED OUT, BUT MY REQUEST IS TO, TO RESEARCH AND LET US KNOW WHAT THESE PROPERTIES ARE, WHAT CITY IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO THESE SPECIFIC PROPERTIES.

ARE THEY BUSINESSES, ARE THEY RESIDENTIAL? ARE THEY, UH, AGRICULTURAL? RIGHT.

A DESCRIPTION OF EACH ONE OF THESE PROPERTIES BEFORE WE, AND WHETHER OR NOT THE PROPERTY OWNER THEMSELVES WANT TO BE REMOVED, SOME OF THEM MAY WANT TO STAY.

SO, YOU KNOW, I THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE FURTHER.

WELL, WE CAN'T DO ANYTHING TONIGHT ANYHOW.

SO WENDY, WELL, WE'VE GOT A COUNCIL MEMBER.

WELL, I, OR WE HAVE TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS NOT HERE.

IF YOU WANT TO TABLE IT, THAT'S FINE.

YOU HAVE TO MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE.

WE CAN WITH TO A CERTAIN DATE.

NOPE.

WE COULD VOTE WITH THREE.

MM-HMM.

YOU, YEAH, WE CAN, YOU CAN VOTE WITH THREE.

BUT I'M JUST SAYING I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE TABLED.

YOU CAN VOTE WITH THREE COUNCIL MEMBERS.

THAT'S ALL YOU NEED.

YEAH, THAT'S RIGHT.

WE CAN, UH, MY ONLY COMMENT ON THAT IS I WOULD LIKE SOME ACTION DIRECTING STAFF.

'CAUSE THIS IS, THIS IS, THIS WILL TAKE SOME TIME.

THIS IS NOT SOMETHING WE'RE GONNA GET BACK TO YOU IN 30, 60 DAYS.

NOPE.

SO IT'S GONNA BE A LIE.

I THINK MS. JA, THAT'S FAIR.

I THINK MS. JACOBS GAVE YOU SOME DIRECTION.

SO MY SUGGESTION WOULD BE IS IS NOT TO ACTUALLY TABLE IT, JUST LET HIM BRING IT BACK WHEN THEY'VE DONE, WHEN HE'S DONE WHAT HE NEEDS TO DO.

BUT IF, IF YOU'RE, IF YOU'RE NOT WANTING TO DO THIS PERIOD, THEN, YOU KNOW, SAVE US A LOT OF WORK.

THANK YOU.

NOT WANTING TO DO WHAT I MEAN TO GO, IF, IF THE, IF THE COUNCIL'S NOT WILLING TO CONSIDER THIS, THEN TAKE AN ACTION, YOU KNOW, APPROVE IT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION TO GO DO, WE'RE TABLING IT.

NO, WE'RE NOT TABLING IT.

I DIDN'T THINK YOU WERE, YOU CAN'T TAKE TO TABLE IT.

YOU HAVE TO GIVE IT A SPECIFIC TIMELINE, A DATE, CERTAIN.

4 0 3 1, WHATEVER THE VOTE IS.

AND SO THAT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE.

THE BEST THING FOR EVERYTHING IS MS. JACOBS TO TAKE, UH, ARIS NORWOOD TO TAKE MS. JACOBS DIRECTION.

AND THEN WHEN HE GETS IT ALL READY IS TO PUT IT BACK ON THE AGENDA.

I THINK THAT'S THE BEST APPROACH.

BUT COUNSEL NEEDS TO VOTE ON THAT, RIGHT? NO, THEY DON'T NEED TO VOTE ON THAT.

YES, THEY DO.

WELL, I, I WOULD PREFER A VOTE ON THAT.

THAT COUNSEL'S GIVEN ME DIRECTION.

[00:20:01]

THEY'RE DIFFERENT ORDINANCES.

I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION FOR LEGAL.

IF THEY ALL CAME IN AS ONE GROUP, CAN WE PICK, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE ALL OF THESE EXCEPT FOR THIS ONE AND THIS ONE AND THIS ONE, BECAUSE THEY'RE DIFFERENT.

SO THEY WERE INDIVIDUAL.

IT'S ACTUALLY TWO GROUPS.

THEY WERE INDIVIDUAL.

WELL, THAT'S TRUE.

IT'S TWO GROUPS.

UH, BUT THEY ALL CAME IN AT THE SAME TIME.

NO, THE TIMING OF IT DOESN'T MATTER.

THE SEPARATE, IT'S TWO DIFFERENT MONTHS.

THE SEPARATE ORDINANCES, THERE WERE 45 TAKEN IN.

AND SO THAT, THAT BACK ON MY QUESTION BECAUSE WHEN WE WERE VOTING ON IT, WE READ THOSE PROPERTIES ALL AS ONE AND WE HAD ONE VOTE.

AND SO, YOU KNOW, IF YOU SAY YOU HAVE AN ATTACHMENT AS DIFFERENT ORDINANCES, UH, HOW CAN YOU VOTE ON 200 ORDINANCES IN ONE VOTE? IS THAT LEGAL? I MEAN, IS THAT PROPER? IT'S, WELL, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT PROPER, BUT I MEAN IT'S, BUT IT HAPPENED OR YOU'RE SAYING THAT IT HAPPENED? I DON'T REMEMBER HOW IT WAS DONE.

45.

FIVE.

I IN A HUNDRED.

JUST KNOW MY ADVICE WAS EACH PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE ITS OWN ORDINANCE.

I WAS VERY, VERY CLEAR ABOUT THAT.

I WAS VERY CLEAR WHY? AND I WENT INTO DETAIL ABOUT THAT.

NOW, HOW IT ALL ENDED UP HAPPENING.

I DO NOT KNOW.

WELL SEE, YOU KNOW, ALTHOUGH I VOTED NO ON IT.

I THINK THEY'RE IN THE CITY.

I THINK SERVICES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED, EVEN IF YOU HAVE NOT.

MAY I CONTINUE? PLEASE.

THEY HAD FIRE.

AND MAAM, SHE'S TALKING POLICE PROTECTION.

SHE, I SAID SHE'S TALKING PLEASE.

I DO LIKE YOUR IDEA TO ASK.

I THINK THAT'S A REALLY GOOD IDEA TO ASK.

YOU KNOW, IT, IT MIGHT BE MORE.

I'VE HAD IT WITH YOU.

I'M NOT GONNA BE CAREFUL.

POINT OF ORDER.

MAYOR, PLEASE SIT DOWN.

I WILL NOT BE CUSSED.

UNDERSTOOD.

I MEAN, YOU, YOU RUN THE MEETING.

I UNDERSTAND.

YOU KNOW, SHE USED TO SHUT HER MOUTH.

I'LL NOT BE POKED.

YOU HAVEN'T BEEN POKED? NOT THIS TIME.

UM, OKAY.

TAKING A BREAK.

SHE CAN'T DO THAT, MAN.

I KNOW THAT.

I MEAN, SHE THINKS SHE'S RUNNING EVERYTHING.

SHE'S NOT OKAY.

ANYTHING.

HOW ARE YOU DOING? Y'ALL GOT GREAT CHRISTMAS PLANS.

I HOPE EVERYONE DOES.

OH, THIS IS THE PEOPLE Y'ALL.

THAT'S F****D UP.

WE ALL NEED TO GET BOARD DECORUM HERE.

WE HAD ONE COUNCIL MEMBER TO GET SICK AND SHE LEFT.

I APOLOGIZE.

THAT WAS NOT EXPLAINED IN ADVANCE TO Y'ALL, BUT, UM, SHE GOT SICK AND HAD TO LEAVE.

UM, SO WE ARE NOW IN A, IN A BREAK CHRISTMAS, CAROL KU, THERE NEEDS TO BE, AND I KNOW WE CAN'T LEGALLY DO IT 'CAUSE WE'RE NOT A CHARTER, SO, GREAT.

I'LL GO HOME AND LAST ON MY WHOLE, OKAY, WE'RE BACK IN SESSION AND AT THIS TIME I'M GONNA CALL FOR A VOTE.

WHAT? TO REMOVE THEM? NO, WE'VE GOTTA HAVE A MOTION FIRST.

MAYOR.

BEFORE WE CAN CALL FOR A VOTE.

I THOUGHT THEY WERE GONNA DISCUSS THAT, THAT, YOU KNOW, MY RE MY REQUEST IS TO GIVE THEM A TIME TO INVESTIGATE WHAT THESE PROPERTIES WERE.

MM-HMM .

SERGIO, WHAT DO YOU WANT TO DO? WHATEVER MY POINT OF VIEW IS, I'M SORRY, I'VE GOT SCHOOL MESSAGES HERE.

UM, MY HEART SAYS DON'T REMOVE 'EM.

IT'S BEEN BROUGHT IN.

YOU'RE SETTING A PRECEDENCE.

YEP.

UM, MM-HMM .

IT'S EXACTLY WHAT'S TAKEN, YOU KNOW, MY, MY MIND OF PROPERTY OWNER'S RIGHTS.

THEY WERE BROUGHT IN AND SO, BUT THAT'S MORE RIGHTS FOR THE STATE.

SO, UM, I DON'T KNOW WHAT PROPERTIES THESE ARE, BUT I WILL SAY I DON'T LIKE THE IDEA OF SETTING A PRECEDENCE TO REMOVE SOMETHING THAT'S BEEN BROUGHT INTO THE CITY.

THANK YOU.

SO I DON'T WANNA MAKE THAT MOTION.

I WILL SECOND IT.

IF YOU TO MAKE THAT MOTION, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO MOVE FORWARD, FORWARD, MOVE FORWARD.

HOW, HOW ON THE OLD ORDINANCE, WHATEVER, WHATEVER THIS IS.

TO TO NOT REPEAL OR TO REPEAL.

WELL THEN YOU JUST DON'T TAKE ANY ACTION.

YOU JUST DON'T TAKE ANY, YOU DON'T TAKE NO ACTION.

SO NO ACTION.

AND THEY STAY IN THE CITY.

THEY CAN COME BACK IN 90 DAYS.

THANK, RIGHT.

ISN'T IT 90 DAYS? NO.

IF YOU CAN COME.

NO, YOU CANNOT.

YOU HAVE 90 DAYS.

DAYS TOLD THE LAWYER.

UH, MA'AM.

I DON'T KNOW WHERE IT WE'RE.

LAWYER, YOU CANNOT COME BACK FOR 90 DAYS.

I ASKED THE LAWYER.

I, I DON'T KNOW WHERE THE 90 DAYS COME FROM.

SOMEBODY WANTS TO PUT SOMEBODY CAN PUT IT BACK ON THE NEXT, NEXT AGENDA IF THEY FOLLOW THE RULES.

[00:25:01]

TELL ME WHERE THE 90 DAYS COMES FROM.

ERIC.

TELL JUST WHERE DOES THE 90 DAYS COME FROM? THANK YOU FOR ME.

UH, WE'RE MOVING FORWARD PLEASE.

MM-HMM .

EXECUTIVE SESSION, UM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 5, 5, 1 CHAPTER SUB CHAPTER D THE CITY COUNCIL WILL NOW RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.

UM,

[EXECUTIVE SESSION]

CLOSED MEETING TO DISCUSS THE F FOLLOWING PURSUANT TO SECTION 5 5 1 0.0711.

DISCUSS AND CONSIDER POTENTIAL PROCEDURE ERRORS IN ORDINANCE 2025 DASH 0 2 2 0 D AND ORDINANCE 2021 DASH ONE ZERO 2K, WHICH GRANTED A ZONING CHANGE TO PROPERTY.

GENERALLY LOCATED 300 GREEN ROAD, 500 PLEASANT RUN ROAD AND 6 0 1 BELTLINE BELTLINE ROAD IN THE CITY OF WALMART.

AND TO ALLOW THE USE OF A DATA CENTER.

AT THIS TIME WE ARE RECESSING OUR COUNCIL MEETING AT 8 31 EX.

WE ARE NOW GOING INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.

OH THIS IS OUCH.

IT IS 9 0 5.

WE'RE GOING BACK INTO OUR REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING.